[ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 44508: updates EFLAGS definitions

Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo elhoir at gmail.com
Fri Dec 11 21:57:47 CET 2009


i hope you dont mean we no-devs cant discuss stuff and even learn from you

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Alex Ionescu <ionucu at videotron.ca> wrote:

>
>
> > Ergo, we may define them to correctly reflect the EFLAGS register.
>
> Who is "WE"? You're not even a DEV for this project!
>
> >
> > However, but I think Alex is right that the compatible identifiers
> > should be retained.
> > EFLAG_SIGN and EFLAG_ZERO  are used to compare flags in AH after LAHF,
> > and should be retained verbatim, since they are public (in NTDDK.H).
> > As for any MS EFLAGS_xx definitions, I'm not privvy and can't say.
>
> Then shut up and don't post completely USELESS and wrong information.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20091211/fc039e49/attachment.htm 


More information about the Ros-dev mailing list