[ros-dev] rbuild msvc backend

[Sir Gallantmon]

I use the codeblocks backend. Dev-C++ one can die a quick and painful death.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy at gmail.com> wrote:

>  I’d imagine a lot of larger corporations still use 2005 as their
> development environments are more tightly controlled.
>
> I didn’t want to alienate these users.
>
>
>
> Anyway, everything below msvc8 is now falling foul to my delete key.
>
> I’m going to do the same with the entire codeblocks and devcpp backends.
>
> Speak now or forever hold your peace.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Zachary Gorden
> *Sent:* 02 December 2009 15:23
> *To:* ReactOS Development List
> *Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] rbuild msvc backend
>
>
>
> Any reason to still keep 2005?
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I’ve gone down the path of virtually rewriting the msvc backend for rbuild.
> Our current implementation had completely outgrown its original design and
> was becoming very difficult to manage, as highlighted when I was adding
> support for VS 2010.
>
>
>
> Anyway, whilst I’m doing this I think it’s a good time assess what we want
> to support. We currently support Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .NET 2002
> and Visual Studio.NET 2003. This is a waste of time IMO and only adds to the
> complexity of the module
>
> I’m proposing to remove support for these 3 products unless anyone has any
> reasons against.
>
>
>
> Ged.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20091202/40eaef9d/attachment-0001.htm