[ros-dev] GetGlyphOutline

[Andrew Scott]

Sorry, I was trying to pointing out the comment sedwards made.

Maarten Bosma wrote:
> That bug is a unimplemented call. It is doubtable that it will be 
> implemented while the audit, isn't it ?
>
>
> Maarten Bosma
>
> Andrew Scott wrote:
>> On a bug i had open i got this:
>>
>>
>> sedwards at reactos.com changed:
>>
>>           What    |Removed                     |Added
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>
>>             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>>         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Additional Comments From sedwards at reactos.com  2006-01-31 
>> 08:43 CET -------
>> Reopen if problem is still there after the audit
>>
>>
>> Maarten Bosma wrote:
>>
>>> Why do you want to close all bugs ? Most of them will be still vaild 
>>> after the audit. I'd say the better solution is to add them to the 
>>> patch  category.
>>>
>>>
>>> Maarten Bosma
>>>
>>>
>>> Steven Edwards wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi James,
>>>>
>>>> On 1/31/06, James Tabor
>>>> <jimtabor at adsl-64-217-116-74.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I finished a fast port of GetGlyphOutline from Wine. Not too bad, 
>>>>> no crashes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nice. Can you open a bug on bugzilla and attach a patch there? I am
>>>> closing out all of the bugs except for the ones that have patches with
>>>> them so we can merge them as part of the audit.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev