[ros-dev] Re: [ros-svn] [ion] 20580: - New ERESOURCE implementation: fixes the return value of some functions (VOID vs NTSTATUS, USHORT vs ULONG), as well as optimized the code loops and general structure of the code. Additionnaly, functions do not simply call other functions with similar names; the exact implementation of each function has now been properly separated (see the DDK for more information on this) to have the most optimized scenarios.

Hartmut Birr osexpert at googlemail.com
Thu Jan 5 23:46:44 CET 2006

Alex Ionescu wrote:
> Hartmut Birr wrote:
>> I'm using a modified make.exe which can start multiple threads. I used
>> the parameter '-j2' on both machines. Possible, it makes more stress for
>> the ERESOURCE implementation.
>> - Hartmut
> Am currently checking the wait bug at the moment, so I haven't looked
> at the resource code, but one thing strikes me -- the bugcheck is a
> new one that I've added to detect with a non-acquired resource is
> being freed. This check did not exist in the previous code(IIRC), so
> it's possible that my implementation is fine, it's simply detecting
> incorrect usage. Can you check Vfat and make sure that it actually
> DOES own the resource?
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu

I've looked to DoQuery from vfat. I'm sure it does only release the
resource, if it was acquired previously.

- Hartmut

More information about the Ros-dev mailing list