[ros-dev] GPL Microsoft Code in the CRT
Alex Ionescu
ionucu at videotron.ca
Mon Nov 28 02:19:51 CET 2005
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
>>From: TwoTailedFox
>>
>>Owning?
>>
>>
>
>Yes, Microsoft still owns that code, like I own the code I contributed to
>ReactOS. They (and me too :)) have given an irrevokable, perpetual license
>to use it, but they still own it.
>
>
>
>>If this code is open-source/public domain, what is the problem?
>>
>>
>
>There is no legal problem, but it can get confusing. "You guys didn't use
>any of the leaked source code, so there is no Microsoft code in your OS?"
>"Well, actually, there are a few bits of Microsoft code". I agree with
>Steven, it's much better to not have to explain this.
>
>
There is a clear differnce between closed leaked source code and GPL
code donated to the community. The whole point of the GPL is to benefit
the entire base of developers and users with your code. If we're going
to start behaving like immature brats "oh noes! It's MS GPL! ewww it's
got the cooties!" then all we're doing is undermining the very essence
of the open source movement. If you want MS to change their practices
and start embracing this practice, it's not by denying them the right to
have their code used that you're going to be helping things. By denying
their code, you're just acting selfishly like a child and will make them
think twice about what the whole point of Open Sourcing software is, if
they're still bring treated like shit?
>GvG
>
>
>
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list