[ros-dev] Re: [ros-diffs] [ion] 19352: - Reimplement Fast Mutex implementation in HAL/NT to be compatible with the real implementation. (Fast Mutex needs to raise IRQL).

Alex Ionescu ionucu at videotron.ca
Sun Nov 20 13:47:05 CET 2005


Hartmut Birr wrote:

>
>Hi,
>
>this piece of  code is wrong. If we terminating a thread, which waits on
>something, we do unblock the thread. The thread must check, if it got
>the lock, if not it must wait again.
>
>- Hartmut
>  
>
Hi,

I'm afraid that's incorrect; if the wait gets satisfied you -will- get 
the fast mutex.

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu


More information about the Ros-dev mailing list