[ros-dev] Re: [ros-diffs] [ion] 19352: - Reimplement Fast Mutex
implementation in HAL/NT to be compatible with the real implementation.
(Fast Mutex needs to raise IRQL).
Alex Ionescu
ionucu at videotron.ca
Sun Nov 20 13:47:05 CET 2005
Hartmut Birr wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>this piece of code is wrong. If we terminating a thread, which waits on
>something, we do unblock the thread. The thread must check, if it got
>the lock, if not it must wait again.
>
>- Hartmut
>
>
Hi,
I'm afraid that's incorrect; if the wait gets satisfied you -will- get
the fast mutex.
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list