[ros-dev] Re: [ros-bugs] [Bug 399] OpenOffice Metabug

[WaxDragon]

Why was this done?  Having these bugs listed as blockers to 399 allows
devs to find the old bugs easier in case of regressions.  I don't see
any downsize to keeping them listed.

On 12/28/05, ReactOS.Bugzilla at reactos.org <ReactOS.Bugzilla at reactos.org> wrote:
> http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=399
>
>
> greatlord at reactos.com changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   BugsThisDependsOn|398, 400, 937               |
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From greatlord at reactos.com  2005-12-28 17:54 CET -------
> Bug 398 are fixed, Bug 400 are fixed, Bug 937 are fixed
> I remove tuse from Bug depends on.
>
>
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
> You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-bugs mailing list
> Ros-bugs at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-bugs
>

WD
--
<Russell> argh
<Russell> iterator shenanigans :/