[ros-dev] ROS-release prepared

[Brandon Turner]

Don't take anything off the wiki for about 2 more hours!  It is 
unfinished and mess like you said.  Filip looked over the changes and in 
general most are right so I'm adding them to wiki.  I will be done in 
about 2 hours with new formatting and all changes.  Please hold out if 
you can.  I will also be making a less techincal version to explain 
things different in 0.2.7. 

Thanks
Brandon

Robert Köpferl wrote:

> Just now, I was on to extract the changelog off the wiki.
> While I came across your message, I thought, that this is exactly the 
> right information I need. I can't say whehter you shal include this or 
> that. At least it is usus to not provide every very detail, because 
> the changelog on sf is rather for end-users to read (if). If you tell 
> me to include your information in the wiki, I'll wait till tomorrow to 
> include it.
> Seems like it is my part to delete potential unnecessary log entries. 
> Or is anyone here who claims this decissions for her/himself ??
>
> Brandon Turner wrote:
>
>> In an attempt to make this more of a full release then something we 
>> are blwoing off I have skimmed through the svn logs and pulled out 
>> all things i think should be in the change log.  Here is a raw output 
>> of what changes i think should should be added:  
>> www.brandonturner.org/ROS/0.2.7.txt   I dont know if i said this in 
>> my last email or not but I dont know what is important what isnt 
>> really so this could be way off.  3 big things that happened which 
>> arent stressed in the raw log, Filip changed everything(?) to 
>> USE_W32API, Filip and Alex mostly did all the ndk and other header 
>> fixes to make them windows compatible, Casper did rbuild.  I dont 
>> know if the first two things will be added in generic or need to be 
>> added in all sections that they apply too(im guessing most?).  
>> Anyways, later today im going to go through the raw changes again and 
>> later tonight im going to add them to the wiki.  Please tell me 
>> anything in there that should not be added to change log or anything 
>> i missed.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Brandon
>>
>> Robert Köpferl wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> WaxDragon wrote:
>>>
>>>> These issues you have described are known, but intermittent.  I have
>>>> tested the 0.2.7 branch under vmware, qemu and real hardware, and the
>>>> branch has performed consistantly under each platform.  Considering
>>>> the bugs we *did* catch for 0.2.7, I think it's a good release.  The
>>>> 0.2.7 branch has the TC 's blessing. Ship it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Your word in echelon's ear.
>>> It'll be upped until tomorrow.
>>> The RC-releases will disappear as will 2.6
>>>
>>> Hope this will be one of our better releases. (looking to 2.6)
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> WD
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>> Ros-dev at reactos.com
>>> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.com
>> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.com
> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>