[ros-dev] Re: Document pch and linkerflag elements.
Royce Mitchell III
royce3 at ev1.net
Mon Aug 1 09:51:20 CEST 2005
Emanuele Aliberti wrote:
> <group> looks like harmless, but i could not find what it is for.
It was (mostly) created for specifying common options for a collection
of entities. However, a tag specifically documented as a top-level tag
for xi:included files would be better to use for "readability" purposes.
> I put the HTML rendering of the rbuild reference on line here
> http://users.libero.it/ea/ros/rbuild/ for wider audience and peer review.
Cool, thank you.
> After some <group>'ing, loading ReactOS.xml in XXE 2.10 emits this
> error now:
>
> /project/xi:include:
> cannot load file "E:\src\ros\trunk\reactos\config.xml":
> E:\src\ros\trunk\reactos\config.xml (file not found)
>
> I don't know if it is wrong how we specify xi:fallback or if XXE is
> wrong.
http://www.stylusstudio.com/w3c/xinclude/include_element.htm
http://www.stylusstudio.com/w3c/xinclude/fallback_element.htm#fallback_element
It looks like our use of xi:fallback is correct. Perhaps, though, the
problem is that we're not including a DTD for <xi:include>. I tried
doing that once, but the tools I had at hand couldn't get past first
base with external namespaces.
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list