[ros-dev] Re: Document pch and linkerflag elements.

Royce Mitchell III royce3 at ev1.net
Mon Aug 1 09:51:20 CEST 2005


Emanuele Aliberti wrote:

> <group> looks like harmless, but i could not find what it is for.

It was (mostly) created for specifying common options for a collection 
of entities. However, a tag specifically documented as a top-level tag 
for xi:included files would be better to use for "readability" purposes.

> I put the HTML rendering of the rbuild reference on line here 
> http://users.libero.it/ea/ros/rbuild/ for wider audience and peer review.

Cool, thank you.

> After some <group>'ing, loading ReactOS.xml in XXE 2.10 emits this 
> error now:
>
> /project/xi:include:
> cannot load file "E:\src\ros\trunk\reactos\config.xml": 
> E:\src\ros\trunk\reactos\config.xml (file not found)
>
> I don't know if it is wrong how we specify xi:fallback or if XXE is 
> wrong.

http://www.stylusstudio.com/w3c/xinclude/include_element.htm
http://www.stylusstudio.com/w3c/xinclude/fallback_element.htm#fallback_element

It looks like our use of xi:fallback is correct. Perhaps, though, the 
problem is that we're not including a DTD for <xi:include>. I tried 
doing that once, but the tools I had at hand couldn't get past first 
base with external namespaces.



More information about the Ros-dev mailing list