[ros-dev] RE: [ros-cvs] CVS Update: reactos

[Alex Ionescu]

Doesn't one of the Mm functions have a special flag to allocate on 4KB 
alignment, designed for this kind of problem that 64KB alignment does?

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu

Hartmut Birr wrote:

>Hi,
>
>this patch (or some areas in ntoskrnl) isn't correct. This patch puts always
>64kB between the TEB's. This limits the number of threads to 30,000 or less.
>I've found this by an other bug in kernel32.
>
>- Hartmut
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: ros-cvs-bounces at reactos.com 
>>[mailto:ros-cvs-bounces at reactos.com] On Behalf Of Ge van Geldorp
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:49 PM
>>To: ros-cvs at reactos.com
>>Subject: [ros-cvs] CVS Update: reactos
>>
>>
>>CVSROOT:	/CVS/ReactOS
>>Module name:	reactos
>>Repository:	reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/
>>Changes by:	gvg at mok.osexperts.com	04/09/28 12:49:21
>>
>>Modified files:
>>	reactos/ntoskrnl/ex/: sysinfo.c 
>>	reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/: mm.h 
>>	reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/: anonmem.c marea.c 
>>	reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/: process.c 
>>
>>Log message:
>>	NtAllocateVirtualMemory() should return 64k aligned areas
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Ros-cvs mailing list
>>Ros-cvs at reactos.com
>>http://reactos.com/mailman/listinfo/ros-cvs
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ros-dev mailing list
>Ros-dev at reactos.com
>http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>  
>