[ros-dev] Re: [ros-cvs] CVS Update: reactos
Eric Kohl
eric.kohl at t-online.de
Fri Oct 29 12:32:14 CEST 2004
"Aliberti Emanuele" <ea at iol.it> wrote:
> Should we define a sort of "best practice" in inserting a little "p"
> after the subsystem prefix and before the proper function's o
> structure's name, to mark the *p*rivate symbols, or use the "Internal"
> suffix?
>
> 1) NtpLockVirtualMemory (MmpLockVirtualMemory)
> 2) NtLockVirtualMemoryInternal
I think the function in question should be called MiLockVirtualMemory
because it is an internal function of the memory manager. And the Nt- and
Zw-Prefixes are only used for funtions that are exposed via the Int2e
interface. Therefore, internal Nt- or Zw-Functions do not exist.
Regards,
Eric
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list