[ros-dev] Subversion Migration Plan
Eric Kohl
eric.kohl at t-online.de
Thu Dec 16 15:04:39 CET 2004
Alex Ionescu wrote:
> And here's the new tree structure that we (the devs on IRC) have
> mutually agreed to, with much compromise on every camp. We would
> appreciate the input of people who don't hang around, but are still very
> active and part of the Project (ie Hartmut, Eric, etc).
>
> http://mok.lvcm.com/cgi-bin/reactos/roswiki?New_Tree_Structure
Don't you think it's a little too late to ask for comments if you
already made a decision on IRC? This should have been discussed on the
mailing-list _only_!
> Please try to be considerate, it wasn't easy getting so many people to
> agree, and many of us still have reservations.
I can accept this structure but I don't really like it. IMO, the
structure is too deep, for example the lib/win32 directory doesn't make
sense to me. And I would like to move the static libraries to the lib
directory and keep all DLLs (including .kbd and .cpl files) in a new dll
directory. This way, our build system wouldn't need to process the lib
directory three times (1st run: Build static libraries. 2nd run: Build
import libraries. 3rd run: Build DLLs.)
Regards,
Eric
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list