[ros-dev] Subversion Migration Plan

Eric Kohl eric.kohl at t-online.de
Thu Dec 16 15:04:39 CET 2004


Alex Ionescu wrote:

> And here's the new tree structure that we (the devs on IRC) have 
> mutually agreed to, with much compromise on every camp. We would 
> appreciate the input of people who don't hang around, but are still very 
> active and part of the Project (ie Hartmut, Eric, etc).
 >
 > http://mok.lvcm.com/cgi-bin/reactos/roswiki?New_Tree_Structure

Don't you think it's a little too late to ask for comments if you 
already made a decision on IRC? This should have been discussed on the 
mailing-list _only_!


> Please try to be considerate, it wasn't easy getting so many people to 
> agree, and many of us still have reservations.

I can accept this structure but I don't really like it. IMO, the 
structure is too deep, for example the lib/win32 directory doesn't make 
sense to me. And I would like to move the static libraries to the lib 
directory and keep all DLLs (including .kbd and .cpl files) in a new dll 
directory. This way, our build system wouldn't need to process the lib 
directory three times (1st run: Build static libraries. 2nd run: Build 
import libraries. 3rd run: Build DLLs.)


Regards,
Eric



More information about the Ros-dev mailing list